1 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.agents/skills/obsidian-project-memory/references/NOTE-ROUTING.md b/.agents/skills/obsidian-project-memory/references/NOTE-ROUTING.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f85bd5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.agents/skills/obsidian-project-memory/references/NOTE-ROUTING.md
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+# Note Routing
+
+## First decide: durable note or raw material
+
+### Durable note
+
+Treat content as a durable note when it is:
+- likely to be referenced again after days or weeks,
+- about a clearly bounded object,
+- already stable enough to stand on its own,
+- suitable to become the canonical note for that object.
+
+### Raw material
+
+Treat content as raw material when it is:
+- a short-lived intermediate artifact,
+- a draft, memo, scratch note, or meeting fragment,
+- an unverified analysis dump,
+- incomplete support for a note that already exists.
+
+Default rule: **raw material should be summarized before promotion**.
+
+## Route by knowledge type
+
+### Knowledge
+
+Write to `Knowledge/` when the content is stable and explanatory:
+- project background
+- research questions
+- dataset protocol
+- method landscape
+- source inventory
+- codebase overview
+
+Do not put these here by default:
+- temporary ideas,
+- unverified hypotheses with no stable framing,
+- daily execution logs.
+
+### Papers
+
+Write to `Papers/` when the content is primarily literature-facing:
+- single paper notes
+- related-work summaries
+- paper-to-project relevance notes
+- reading notes and literature synthesis
+
+Do not put these here by default:
+- project-only summaries with no literature object,
+- raw meeting notes about papers,
+- unrelated implementation notes.
+
+### Experiments
+
+Write to `Experiments/` when the content is about what was run or will be run:
+- experiment design
+- runbook
+- ablation
+- baseline comparison setup
+- freezing / transfer / screening study
+
+Do not put these here by default:
+- raw metric dumps with no interpretation,
+- broad project framing,
+- final cross-experiment claims that belong in `Results/`.
+
+### Results
+
+Write to `Results/` when the content captures a durable finding:
+- final comparison
+- mechanism conclusion
+- collapse diagnosis
+- figure and csv index
+- cross-experiment interpretation
+- stable canonical claim that should survive beyond one report
+
+Do not put these here by default:
+- unprocessed analysis output,
+- notes that merely restate the experiment setup,
+- temporary result speculation that still belongs in `Daily/`.
+
+### Results Reports
+
+Write to `Results/Reports/` when the content is a **complete internal experiment summary report**:
+- one experiment round retrospective,
+- one batch report for a coherent experiment line,
+- one decision-oriented wrap-up note backed by analysis artifacts.
+
+These notes should use the naming contract:
+- `YYYY-MM-DD--{experiment-line}--r{round}--{purpose}.md`
+
+Do not put these here by default:
+- manuscript-facing draft text,
+- raw metric dumps,
+- vague summaries without one date / line / round / purpose.
+
+### Writing
+
+Write to `Writing/` when the content is meant for external output:
+- paper draft fragments
+- slide narrative
+- rebuttal notes
+- proposal text
+
+Internal experiment reports do **not** belong here unless they are already external-facing writing artifacts.
+
+### Daily
+
+Write to `Daily/` when the content is transient or process-oriented:
+- what happened today
+- short sync queue
+- quick scratch ideas
+- temporary planning fragments
+- lightweight meeting notes
+
+Do not let `Daily/` become the long-term home for canonical project knowledge. Promote durable content later.
+
+## Main routing rule
+
+If a note will still matter after several days or weeks, prefer `Knowledge/`, `Experiments/`, `Results/`, `Results/Reports/`, `Papers/`, or `Writing/`.
+
+If the note is mainly about today's progress or temporary organization, prefer `Daily/`.
+
+## Cross-folder promotion defaults
+
+Treat these folders as a research pipeline, not as independent buckets:
+
+- `Papers/` should usually answer: what should we test, compare, or borrow?
+- `Experiments/` should usually answer: what exactly are we running, and what finding would matter?
+- `Results/` should usually answer: what do we now believe, with evidence?
+- `Results/Reports/` should usually answer: what happened in this round or batch, and what decision does it imply?
+- `Writing/` should usually answer: what should be said externally because of those results?
+
+Default promotion path:
+- paper insight -> experiment note
+- stable experiment finding -> result note
+- coherent round/batch retrospective -> results report note
+- durable result claim -> writing note
+
+If a turn reaches only one stage, keep it there. But when the next stage is already clear, prefer updating the next canonical note instead of leaving the chain broken.